Hampton Inn & Suites St. Louis/Chesterfield vs Hyatt Place St Louis Chesterfield

Same City · Chesterfield Distance: 4.1km

Overview

vs

Hampton Inn & Suites St. Louis/Chesterfield

★★★ 3-Star
8.4 3
Chesterfield
View Details →

Hyatt Place St Louis Chesterfield

★★★ 3-Star
9.7 11
Chesterfield
View Details →

Live Price Comparison

Site Hampton Inn & S... Hyatt Place St ...
Agoda Checking Checking
Booking.com Checking Checking
Expedia Checking Checking
Trip.com Checking Checking

Rating Comparison by Booking Site

Site Hampton Inn & S... Hyatt Place St ...
Agoda
8.8 (487)
9.6 (12)
Booking.com
9.0 (214)
9.2 (290)
Expedia
8.8 (867)
9.6 (1,005)
Trip.com
8.7 (97)
9.3 (103)
Overall Average
8.4 (1,665)
9.7 (1,410)

Strengths & Weaknesses

Hampton Inn & Suites St. Louis/Chesterfield Hyatt Place St Louis Chesterfield
Strengths Strengths
+ Multiple reviews repeatedly praise clean rooms and comfortable beds + High ratings across sites
+ Staff is frequently described as friendly and helpful + Popular with family travelers
+ Breakfast is often called tasty with good variety + Abundant reviews
+ Proximity to the freeway and malls makes getting around easy
+ The well-maintained pool receives positive feedback from families
Weaknesses Weaknesses
- A few reviews mention weak shower water pressure
- Humming mini-fridges or smoke alarm battery beeps are noted
- Occasional lapses in cleaning or stained linens appear in some feedback

Recommended For

Families Business travelers Couples

Recommended For

Families with infants/children Business travelers

Guest Reviews

Hampton Inn & Suites St. Louis/Chesterfield

Expedia 10.0 Family

Staff was kind, breakfast was wonderful, and rooms were clean

Booking.com 4.0 Family

Digital key via app made check-in easy, pool and breakfast were great

Trip.com 10.0 Family

Convenient location with many restaurants and shops nearby

Hyatt Place St Louis Chesterfield

No data

Location Comparison

Distance: 4.1km

This page contains affiliate links and we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.