KAGAYA KYOTO Hachijoguchi Inn vs Tabist kiki HOTEL KYOTO Sanjo Takakura

Same City · Kyoto Distance: 3.4km

Overview

vs

KAGAYA KYOTO Hachijoguchi Inn

0.0 0
Kyoto
View Details →

Tabist kiki HOTEL KYOTO Sanjo Takakura

★★★ 3-Star
9.2 1,073
Kyoto
View Details →

Live Price Comparison

Site KAGAYA KYOTO Ha... Tabist kiki HOT...
Agoda Checking Checking
Booking.com Checking Checking
Expedia Checking Checking
Trip.com Checking Checking
라쿠텐트래블 Checking Checking

Rating Comparison by Booking Site

Site KAGAYA KYOTO Ha... Tabist kiki HOT...
Agoda
-
9.2 (1,074)
Booking.com
-
9.0 (1,033)
Expedia
-
9.8 (6)
Trip.com
-
9.0 (6)
Overall Average
0.0
9.2 (2,119)

Strengths & Weaknesses

KAGAYA KYOTO Hachijoguchi Inn Tabist kiki HOTEL KYOTO Sanjo Takakura
Strengths Strengths
+ Spacious villa layout with three bedrooms and a living room, ideal for families + Rooms are spacious and clean, repeated across multiple sites
+ Fully equipped kitchen allows for self-catering + 5-minute walk to subway makes transport convenient
+ Terrace and balcony provide a relaxing outdoor space + Tatami space is comfortable with good soundproofing
+ Nearby restaurants, cafes, supermarkets make daily life easy
+ Staff friendliness praised in many reviews
Weaknesses Weaknesses
- Some reviews mention toilet smell
- Windows only open a little bit
- Pillows are firm

Recommended For

Families Long-term travelers

Recommended For

Couples Families Solo travelers Friend groups

Guest Reviews

KAGAYA KYOTO Hachijoguchi Inn

No data

Tabist kiki HOTEL KYOTO Sanjo Takakura

Agoda 10.0 Couple

Many nearby eateries, great transport, spacious clean room

Trip.com 9.0 Solo

5min to subway, restaurants supermarkets nearby

Unstaffed 10pm-8am

Booking.com 9.5 Couple

Clean spacious quiet

Window opens little

Expedia 10.0 Family

Perfect for family of 4, great location

Booking.com 9.0 Solo

Near subway, large room big tub

Moldy toilet smell

Location Comparison

Distance: 3.4km

This page contains affiliate links and we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.