Queen Home vs Ibis Styles Roma Aurelia Queen Home vs Ibis Styles Roma Aurelia
Same City · Rome
Distance: 19.0km
Overview
vs
Queen Home
Queen Home
★★★★
4-Star
7.4
3 reviews
Rome
Property Type: Single Room
Room Size: 116㎡
Ibis Styles Roma Aurelia
Ibis Styles Roma Aurelia
★★★★
4-Star
8.2
1,121 reviews
Rome
Property Type: Hotel
Room Size: -
Live Price Comparison
| Site | Queen Home Queen Home | Ibis Styles Rom... Ibis Styles Roma Aurelia |
|---|---|---|
| Agoda | ||
| Booking.com | ||
| Expedia | ||
| Trip.com |
Rating Comparison by Booking Site
| Site | Queen Home Queen Home | Ibis Styles Rom... Ibis Styles Roma Aurelia |
|---|---|---|
| Agoda |
7.4
(3)
|
8.2
(1,072)
|
| Booking.com |
-
|
8.3
(1,002)
|
| Overall Average |
7.4
(3)
|
8.2
(2,074)
|
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Queen Home Queen Home | Ibis Styles Roma Aurelia Ibis Styles Roma Aurelia |
|---|---|
| Strengths | Strengths |
| + Rooms are spacious, great for families according to many reviews | |
| + Pool is clean and convenient to use, repeatedly praised | |
| + Restaurant food and breakfast are tasty, mentioned across sites | |
| + Friendly staff and convenient shuttle service commonly noted | |
| + Clean and quiet, frequent in reviews | |
| Weaknesses | Weaknesses |
| - Far from Rome center, travel inconvenient repeatedly complained | |
| - Some rooms lack windows or pillows, noted in reviews | |
| - No kettle, hard to make tea as pointed out | |
Recommended For
Business travelers
Families
|
Recommended For
Families
Couples
Pool lovers
|
Guest Reviews
Queen Home
Queen Home
Agoda
10.0
Business traveler
High satisfaction rating
Ibis Styles Roma Aurelia
Ibis Styles Roma Aurelia
Booking.com
8.0
Family
Spacious room and shuttle convenient
No window
Booking.com
9.0
Solo
Pool and bar good, staff friendly
Location poor
Booking.com
8.5
Couple
Restaurant food excellent
Agoda
8.8
Couple
Convenient and great value
Agoda
10.0
Family
Very spacious room
Location Comparison
Distance: 19.0km
This page contains affiliate links and we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.