Wingate by Wyndham Coon Rapids vs Hyatt Regency Minneapolis Wingate by Wyndham Coon Rapids vs Hyatt Regency Minneapolis
Same City · Minneapolis
Distance: 26.8km
Overview
vs
Wingate by Wyndham Coon Rapids
Wingate by Wyndham Coon Rapids
★★
2-Star
8.2
23 reviews
Minneapolis
Property Type: -
Room Size: -
Hyatt Regency Minneapolis
Hyatt Regency Minneapolis
★★★★
4-Star
8.0
20 reviews
Minneapolis
Property Type: -
Room Size: -
Live Price Comparison
| Site | Wingate by Wynd... Wingate by Wyndham Coon Rapids | Hyatt Regency M... Hyatt Regency Minneapolis |
|---|---|---|
| Agoda | Checking | Checking |
| Booking.com | Checking | Checking |
| Expedia | Checking | Checking |
| Trip.com | Checking | Checking |
Rating Comparison by Booking Site
| Site | Wingate by Wynd... Wingate by Wyndham Coon Rapids | Hyatt Regency M... Hyatt Regency Minneapolis |
|---|---|---|
| Agoda |
8.0
(28)
|
8.6
(3,216)
|
| Booking.com |
7.6
(303)
|
8.4
(320)
|
| Expedia |
7.8
(1,004)
|
8.8
(1,000)
|
| Trip.com |
7.8
(97)
|
8.5
(100)
|
| Overall Average |
8.2
(1,432)
|
8.0
(4,636)
|
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Wingate by Wyndham Coon Rapids Wingate by Wyndham Coon Rapids | Hyatt Regency Minneapolis Hyatt Regency Minneapolis |
|---|---|
| Strengths | Strengths |
| + Stable 7-8 range ratings across multiple booking sites | + Ratings in the 8s across booking sites |
| + High review volume boosts reliability | + Over 3000 reviews on one site |
| + Diverse guest types | |
| Weaknesses | Weaknesses |
Recommended For
Other travelers
Couples
|
Recommended For
Other travelers
Couples
Business
|
Guest Reviews
Wingate by Wyndham Coon Rapids
Wingate by Wyndham Coon Rapids
Expedia
7.8
리뷰 1004개
Agoda
8.0
리뷰 28개
Booking.com
7.6
리뷰 303개
Trip.com
7.8
리뷰 97개
Hyatt Regency Minneapolis
Hyatt Regency Minneapolis
Expedia
8.8
Other
High rating maintained
Agoda
8.6
Couple
Many reviews
Booking.com
8.4
Business
Stable rating
Trip.com
8.5
Solo
Positive feedback
Location Comparison
Distance: 26.8km
This page contains affiliate links and we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.