Hotel Analysis
Based on 4 sites · 1,301 reviews
Located in Traverse City, Michigan, this 2.5-star property is known to travelers prioritizing value. Guests generally respond positively to the friendly attitude of the staff and the spaciousness of some rooms.
On the other hand, there are recurring mentions of facility aging. Many reviews point out maintenance issues, cleanliness concerns, and road noise, indicating significant dissatisfaction with facility upkeep. Amenities like the pool or hot tub are sometimes unavailable, so checking ahead is recommended.
Overall, while the hotel's service mindset is well-regarded, the aging facilities significantly impact the stay experience. It may be suitable for travelers seeking a low-cost option during a quick trip, but those expecting a pristine environment should consider other options.
Strengths
Friendly and warm service from staff
Spacious layout in some rooms
Relatively affordable price point
Good to Know
Aging facilities and poor maintenance
Noise issues due to proximity to the road
Concerns regarding cleanliness and odors
Recommended For
Budget travelers — Suitable for those who prioritize low price and location over facility quality.
Pet owners — The hotel has a pet-friendly policy, making it an option for those traveling with animals.
Ratings by Booking Site
Overall 6.6/10 · 4 sites · Based on 1,301 reviews
Guest Reviews
4 booking sites · 1,301 reviews
Frequently Mentioned
Agoda
·
Couple
Expedia
·
Solo
Booking.com
·
Other
Trip.com
·
Other
Nearby
Google MapsLoading map...
FAQ
The hotel allows up to 3 pets per room. It is recommended to check the specific policy before arrival.
Some guests have reported that these facilities can be closed for maintenance. Checking availability before booking is advised.
Due to its location near the road, many guests have noted that noise can be an issue for light sleepers.
A continental breakfast is provided, and some guests mention that hot food options are occasionally available.
While some guests find their rooms clean, others have expressed concerns regarding maintenance and cleanliness due to the age of the building.